Information Today, Inc. Corporate Site KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology Unisphere/DBTA
Other ITI Websites
American Library Directory Boardwalk Empire Database Trends and Applications DestinationCRM Faulkner Information Services Fulltext Sources Online InfoToday Europe KMWorld Literary Market Place Plexus Publishing Smart Customer Service Speech Technology Streaming Media Streaming Media Europe Streaming Media Producer Unisphere Research

News & Events > NewsBreaks
Back Index Forward
Twitter RSS Feed

The Future of SLA: A Strategic Framework and Recommendations for Moving Forward
Posted On June 30, 2015
This is a crucial time for the Special Libraries Association (SLA). Founded in 1909 by John Cotton Dana, SLA is in the midst of an identity crisis. With declining membership and diminishing revenue, the association is grappling with what its future will be, and the departure of CEO Janice Lachance at the end of 2014 sparked a discussion about the best way forward. Its board of directors hired two consultants who are both active SLA members—Ulla de Stricker of de Stricker Associates and Cynthia Shamel of Shamel Information Services—to recommend changes related to all aspects of the association.

After reviewing existing SLA documents and interviewing staffers and dozens of current members, the consultants submitted their “SLA: Succeed. Lead. Advance. Recommendations Report” on May 15, 2015 (much earlier than their contract called for). The early submission allowed for intense scrutiny by the membership and spirited discussions at SLA’s 2015 annual conference, both in hallways and during the annual business meeting, which was held from 5 to 6 p.m. following the closing general session. The meeting managed to keep hundreds of dedicated and passionate members in the room who were enthusiastic about expressing their opinions and listening to the opinions of their peers.

Upon the publication of the recommendations report, the board asked for comments on it, extending the deadline until June 23, 2015. After reviewing the comments, the board plans to hold a strategy session on July 2, 2015. It will then conduct an open meeting on July 14 (available as a webinar) and vote on whether to receive the report and consider its recommendations.

In voting to receive the report, the board is not voting to accept or implement the recommendations, but merely to take delivery of the document. The distinction between receiving the report and accepting it was a source of confusion for many. One of the basic tenets of the report is that because the recommendations are inextricably linked to each other, all of them should be either accepted or rejected rather than having the board pick and choose among them. This notion was deeply unsettling to many SLA members. Receiving the report does not imply adoption of any of the individual recommendations.

Declining Membership

John J. DiGilio, current treasurer of SLA, presented a chart in his “Special Libraries Association Annual Financial Report for 2014” that showed the membership decline. It has dropped from 12,080 in 2003 to 7,350 in 2014. Why this occurred is well-articulated by DiGilio, who urged a radical rethinking of the association’s business model:

Just 10-15 years ago, SLA was operating in a world where information still flowed mostly in one direction and was printed on paper, where communities were created and nurtured through personal contact, and where employers routinely invested in their employees’ professional development. Today, we’re operating in a world where information flows in all directions, where communities are created online, and where professional development increasingly is a personal responsibility. SLA is no longer a destination. We have become a stepping stone, something to try out for a few years before moving on to the next level.

Longtime SLA members at the annual conference had other answers for how the association got to where it is. Frequently mentioned were the two abortive name-change attempts. Some expressed a sense that past boards had not been forthcoming. I heard the words “arrogant,” “secretive,” and “not transparent” applied to association leadership. I also heard the opposite: that association governance is difficult, particularly for large organizations, and that the membership elects leaders to act for them so that each member doesn’t have to be involved with every single governance decision.

SLA is not the only professional association worried about defining its value to current and potential members. Michael Gruenberg’s article, “Finding Value in Professional Associations: Management and Membership Issues,” in the May/June 2015 issue of Online Searcher proves that.

Strategic Framework

Shamel and de Stricker’s recommendations report presents a strategic framework for SLA by promulgating this mission statement: “SLA is the association for information professionals seeking to be the best they can be in their careers and striving to advance the goals of the organizations they serve. SLA equips members to succeed, lead, and advance.”

The report outlines the challenges, key strategies, and resulting benefits in seven distinct areas: business partnerships, new products and services, conference models, organizational review, revenue model and financial review, market viability, and membership levels.

Some of its recommendations revolve around the view that SLA’s importance to its members lies in continuing education to enhance job skills. Recommendations about reducing the number of individual units (chapters, divisions, and caucuses) and concentrating more activities centrally from headquarters, including a revenue-sharing model, are likely to be the most controversial. A change in the dues structure is probably inevitable.

As with any major upheaval, some SLA members are in favor of retaining the status quo while others advocate wholesale change. In the case of SLA, continuing on its present course is simply not tenable.

For some, SLA is undergoing an identity crisis. For others, it’s more than that—SLA being in crisis is personal. As Marjorie M.K. Hlava phrased it in her acceptance speech for the John Cotton Dana Award at the opening general session of SLA’s 2015 annual conference, “In my nearly 40 years in SLA I have developed my professional heart here.” Citing Dana’s actions when founding SLA, she continued, “Our society needs to remove barriers, give access to information to all members, remove unnecessary rules and unfriendly polices. We need to test what we do, measure our success in numbers, and test the potential results of new polices BEFORE we implement them.”

When SLA’s board votes to receive the report, which it will probably do, the work of changing the association will start. The board should look first at the strategic framework and decide whether the initial premise of the report is valid before beginning to judge individual recommendations. From conversations with several board members, it seems it is prepared to move in that direction.

The question is not what SLA can do to avert a crisis—it’s already in crisis. The question is how SLA can make a turnaround and once again become a vital organization for information professionals.

Update July 15, 2015:

At a special meeting on July 14, 2015, the Special Libraries Association (SLA) board of directors voted to receive the revised version of the consultants’ “Recommendations Report” (login required). Receiving the report means the board acknowledges the work done but has taken no action regarding the recommendations. Revisions to the original document, shown in red in this version, are extensive. Some are substantive, based on the 50-plus comments the board received from individual members and from SLA units (chapters and divisions), while others are grammatical.

In a second vote, the board accepted the strategic framework, “Road Map for the Future of SLA” (login required), which spells out the seven areas in which change will be implemented. By accepting the report, the board indicates its approval of the content and direction of the document. It will now move forward toward implementing it.

Finally, the board voted to task the change consultants, de Stricker Associates and Shamel Information Services, with developing a multiphase implementation plan. This will be done in coordination with SLA staffers and will consider member feedback.

With these three votes, SLA hopes to put itself on a path toward regaining its luster, reasserting itself as the foremost association for information professionals, and resolving its identity crisis.

Marydee Ojala is the editor-in-chief of Online Searcher magazine, chairs WebSearch University, and is Program Development Director for Enterprise Search & Discovery.

Email Marydee Ojala

Related Articles

6/18/2009SLA’s Click University Offers Free Credo E-References to Members
8/27/2009SLA Forms New Professional Interest Group for Taxonomy Professionals
12/14/2009SLA Is Still SLA; Membership Votes No on Name Change
3/14/2011Organizations Support Free Online Access to CRS Reports
6/3/2014Playing the Numbers: NISO/NASIG Focus On Best Practices for Library Usage Statistics
7/21/2015Voting on the Future of SLA
6/9/2016SLA Honors John Cotton Dana Award Recipients
7/12/2016SLA Courts Controversy With New Communications Platform

Comments Add A Comment
Posted By Karen Bleier7/6/2015 6:02:03 PM

I joined SLA five years ago when I re-entered the corporate sector, and the first message I received was that SLA was in crisis. The second was that I needed to stop being a librarian and be something else, or I was old-fashioned, stuck-in-the-mud, had my head in the sand, and was of no value to my employer or SLA. It was clear from the beginning that this organization respected neither itself, me, nor my profession.
I have only stayed because some of the chapters offer nice, affordable lunchtime training sessions.
As someone once said, "Degrees, titles, labels, and veritable professionalism are the products of high accomplishment and not its causes." If adopting this report were to lead SLA back in that direction, that would be a good thing. If not, then it's just so much sound and fury.
Posted By Lynda Moulton7/1/2015 11:19:55 AM

Couldn't agree more with Gross and Buntrock. I devoted hundreds of hours in the 1970s and 1980s in SLA on an effort toward certification, reforming graduate library school curriculum to offer a two year program for "special" librarianship focused on subject and business information science matters, and to take back governance and control from academic leadership. The previous two Executive Directors threw up barriers at every point of action. Opportunities in the business and industrial sector abound but suitable professionals are not available. "Professional" associations that do not advocate for and build up opportunities for their native constituency are not professional. Get back to "Putting knowledge to work" or perhaps it is too late.
Posted By Bobbi Weaver6/30/2015 7:37:31 PM

I wholeheartedly agree that smaller and more affordable conference venues need to be considered. Many of us are now funding conference attendance in whole or in part. $300/night hotels are not feasible to those of us on a budget. There were about 4 SLA attendees at the HI Hostel in Boston. Charlotte, NC has an international airport, convention center and affordable hotel rooms located near the convention center. There are other Southeastern U.S. cities that would also be more affordable.
Posted By Margaret Gross6/30/2015 7:23:07 PM

Less emphasis on library/academic situations. More on corporate data and configuration management. Just as engineering has different streams e.g. chemical, electrical, etc., so should there be diffent information studies promoted by SLA.
after a 2 year graduate program, I knew nothing about patents, standards, document revision control, document lifecycle, data warehouses, etc. This is where the jobs are.SLA should take lead in real life training, partnering with universities, and offering accredited diplomas and certificates. Maybe SLA coulde be a catalyst. To summarize one steam academic/public, another stream industrial KM
Posted By Robert (Bob) Buntrock6/30/2015 4:28:08 PM

Although I've never been am SLA member, my career as a chemical information specialist has been linked with SLA and SLA members. I briefly considered joining SLA when I took 'early retirement" and formed my own information consultancy but decided not to because my primary organizations were (and are) ACS and its information division. I was always curious why SLA never established its own certification process. Job listings for librarians and even some information specialists required ALA certification even back in the early days of online information access and many library schools were very slow in adopting online training and education. Special Librarians with appropriate degrees should be certified as such. I still wonder if this lack of identity at the professional level (and a separate identity is well warranted) has contributed to the decline in membership. Another factor is the decline in volunteerism in all spheres including professional societies. The diminishing or even cessation of employer support of professional activities, in both time and money has been a factor, which I can identify with from experiences with my former employer. Anything overhead disappeared and we professionals had to account for 2000 billable hours per annum. I hope that SLA can recover from it's difficulties.

              Back to top