Information Today, Inc. Corporate Site KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology Unisphere/DBTA
Other ITI Websites
American Library Directory Boardwalk Empire Database Trends and Applications DestinationCRM Faulkner Information Services Fulltext Sources Online InfoToday Europe KMWorld Literary Market Place Plexus Publishing Smart Customer Service Speech Technology Streaming Media Streaming Media Europe Streaming Media Producer Unisphere Research

News & Events > NewsBreaks
Back Index Forward
Twitter RSS Feed

Preprint Evolution at arXiv
Posted On October 24, 2017
When began in 1991, it validated the importance of preprints for physicists. Paul Ginsparg, then working at Los Alamos National Laboratory, created arXiv to centralize the dissemination of preprints among colleagues so they could share opinions and knowledge before publication in official journal format. Instead of going to their inboxes to see new preprints, physicists could check the central repository. The origin story continues with a move from New Mexico to Cornell University Library when Ginsparg joined the Cornell faculty in 2001. It remains at Cornell today, with Ginsparg a member of its scientific advisory board.

The scope of arXiv has expanded mightily since 1991. As one of the very first digital archives, it has always been OA, even before that became a celebrated publishing model. Registration is required to upload a paper, but anyone can search arXiv and download papers.

Currently, arXiv hosts more than 1 million of what it calls “e-prints.” It has divided the discipline of physics into 13 subdisciplines, including astrophysics and quantum physics. Over the years, it has also added mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, and quantitative finance. In September 2017, it added two new disciplines: economics and electrical engineering and systems science.

Economics Joins arXiv

Economics, in particular, seems a far cry from physics. However, economists were early proponents of the distribution of preprints. RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) began in 1997, succeeding NetEc, which started in 1993. Contributors to RePEc represent 93 countries, and material is submitted by numerous archives. In addition to preprints (which often in economics are known as working papers), it contains articles, software components, books, and book chapters. Most are classified using the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) system devised by the American Economic Association. RePEc papers are OA and can also be found (if not in their entirety) on EconLit, Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic Search, OAIster (WorldCat), ResearchGate, and EBSCO Information Services.

The Economics portion of arXiv is, at this point, limited to econometrics. Being very new, only 25 articles appear in the database, 14 of which are solely in the Economics section. The others are cross-listed in other disciplines. The rationale behind adding Economics was the realization that papers submitted to the statistics domain of arXiv were actually about econometrics.

Controversies Surrounding Preprint Repositories

It has not been a totally smooth ride for arXiv. In 2015, a controversy over its screening policies erupted when a paper concerning black holes written by two graduate students, Thiago Guerreiro and Fernando Monteiro, was rejected. Accusations that the moderation policy was misapplied were rebuffed by arXiv moderators, who said no blacklist existed and that standards for accepting a paper were not nearly as stringent as those for peer-reviewed journals.

Other controversies occurred in the social sciences. When Elsevier bought SSRN (Social Sciences Research Network) in May 2016, the worry was that it would cease to be OA. That hasn’t happened, although Elsevier has removed a number of papers it believes violate copyright. An alternative OA repository, SocArXiv, debuted in July 2016. It is powered by the Center for Open Science (COS), which maintains other repositories, including AgriXiv for agriculture, BITSS for transparency in research, engrXiv for engineering, and FocUS Archive for the Focused Ultrasound Foundation.

The American Geophysical Union (AGU) announced on Sept. 21, 2017, that it is developing—along with Atypon—a preprint server named ESSOAr (Earth and Space Science Open Archive). The archive, which will use Atypon’s Literatum technology, will be partially supported by Wiley. A competing repository, EarthArXiv, is powered by the COS.

Due to its age, arXiv invites criticism about its technology. For one thing, commenting on individual papers is not supported. A submission history is provided, which could reflect comments sent directly to authors, but comments do not appear with the paper. Papers can be downloaded in PDF and PostScript formats. As technology advances, these formats may no longer be sufficient.

If nothing else, the popularity of arXiv and the creation of numerous other digital repositories for preprints are testaments to the importance of preprints and working papers for researchers. Making this information freely available also catches the interest of journalists and the general public. What was once, a quarter century ago, esoteric, exotic, and inaccessible is now front and center as a research information source.

Marydee Ojala is the editor-in-chief of Online Searcher magazine, chairs WebSearch University, and is Program Development Director for Enterprise Search & Discovery.

Email Marydee Ojala

Related Articles

8/20/2013OA Rules at the University of California
12/17/2013What the Open Access Button Means for the Future of Research and Publishing
7/7/2015Highlights From the CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication
7/21/2016Social Sciences Repository Alternative to SSRN Debuts
8/16/2016ACS to Introduce Chemistry Preprint Server
1/9/2018SSRN Adds EngRN Preprint Server for Engineers
10/2/2018Let's Ring In American Archives Month
6/11/2019Organizations Band Together for medRxiv Preprint Service
6/20/2019SSRN Plans Debut of CiteRight Citations and Reference Service
1/18/2022' Reaches a Milestone and a Reckoning' by Daniel Garisto

Comments Add A Comment

              Back to top