Information Today, Inc. Corporate Site KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology Unisphere/DBTA
Other ITI Websites
American Library Directory Boardwalk Empire Database Trends and Applications DestinationCRM Faulkner Information Services Fulltext Sources Online InfoToday Europe KMWorld Literary Market Place Plexus Publishing Smart Customer Service Speech Technology Streaming Media Streaming Media Europe Streaming Media Producer Unisphere Research

News & Events > NewsBreaks
Back Index Forward
Twitter RSS Feed

Committee Meeting Discusses the Future of FOIA
Posted On January 26, 2016
PAGE: 1 2

Nearly 50 years after the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 4, 1966, the House of Representatives passed the FOIA Oversight and Implementation Act of 2015 (HR 653). It sent the bill to the Senate along with H. Rept. 114-391, which amends language in 5 U.S. Code § 552 to reflect the new environment. (For example, “for public inspection and copying” would be replaced by “in an electronic, publicly accessible format.”)

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform also released “FOIA Is Broken: A Report.” It explores the responsiveness of agencies in processing FOIA requests and cites “[e]xcessive delays and redactions” and agencies that have refused “to produce documents or intentionally” extended the time-to-deliver. This lack of transparency in government operations diminishes the trust of the people in their government.

Introduced in February 2015 by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) with bipartisan support, HR 653 provides the public with greater access to federal government agency information. The Congressional Research Service summarizes it as follows:

The bill requires agencies, in administering FOIA, to: (1) make information disclosable under such Act available to the public in an electronic, publicly accessible format; and (2) make available to the public records of general interest that inform the public of the operations and activities of the government or that have been requested three or more times.

The Office of Management and Budget is directed to ensure the operation of an online request portal that allows a member of the public to submit a FOIA request for records to any agency from a single website.

The bill establishes a presumption of openness by prohibiting an agency from withholding information otherwise disclosable under FOIA unless: (1) the agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would cause specific identifiable harm to an interest protected by an exemption to FOIA, or (2) disclosure is prohibited by law.

According to, the proposed legislation “establishes a Chief FOIA Officers Council for developing recommendations for increasing compliance and efficiency information dissemination, increased transparency, and promote performance measures.” Additionally, notes, “The bill includes reforms that will have notable tangible impact,” codifying President Barack Obama’s directive on the presumption of openness with regard to FOIA and buttressing “the presumption in favor of disclosure,” or as Issa says, shifting “the burden to the presumption of yes.”

The Federal FOIA Ombudsman and the FOIA Advisory Committee

HR 653 also expands the duties of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS), which serves as the federal FOIA ombudsman. Created within the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) when the OPEN Government Act of 2007 amended FOIA, OGIS reviews FOIA compliance and policy, mediating disputes between those making FOIA requests and agencies that may have not been as forthcoming as the requester hoped. A calendar on the OGIS website allows the public to see the schedule for FOIA compliance reviews that will be conducted in the coming year. OGIS announces completed compliance review releases on its blog, via Twitter (@FOIA_Ombuds), and on its website.

Established in May 2014, the FOIA Advisory Committee is one of a series of efforts the Obama administration has taken to modernize FOIA. The full committee meets each quarter to deliberate actions it should take to study aspects of FOIA that could be improved and recommends “legislative action, policy changes or executive action.”

Composed of 10 members from within the federal government and 10 nongovernmental members with FOIA expertise (such as lawyers, advocates, academics, and journalists), the committee is expected to “foster dialog between the Administration and the requester community, solicit public comments, and develop consensus recommendations for improving FOIA administration and proactive disclosures.”

The current term expires in May 2016, but David Ferreiro, the 10th Archivist of the U.S., announced that the FOIA Advisory Committee’s charter will be extended another 2 years so that it can continue its work. Those interested in joining the committee should review the bylaws to determine eligibility.

The First Committee Meeting of 2016

Perhaps due to unusually cold weather, few members of the public attended the Jan. 19 open meeting of the FOIA Advisory Committee, the agenda for which can be found on its website. (Interested parties will be able to view the session on YouTube, where all of the previous meeting videos have been posted. Video footage and a transcript of the Jan. 19 session should be available within 30 days, but the public can read the Twitter feed from the session in the meantime.) The committee is exploring ways to stream future sessions so more individuals can participate. The Jan. 19 meeting focused on the work and recommendations of three subcommittees: Fees, Oversight and Accountability, and Proactive Disclosures.

FOIA Fees Subcommittee Report

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provides a uniform fee schedule and guidelines for agencies to follow, placing FOIA requesters into three broad categories—commercial use, noncommercial use, and all others. (Subcategories are detailed in a Federal Register notice.)

OMB’s guidance on fees was written in 1987, before the internet, and has not been updated in nearly 20 years. Therefore, confusion reigns:

  1. Rates for search time and duplication vary by agency, as does the determination process for waiving fees. For example, commercial-use requesters “are charged all three types of fees—search, review, and duplication fees. …” Noncommercial-use requesters include “educational institutions, noncommercial scientific institutions, and representatives of the news media. … Requesters in this category are not charged for search or review time, but they must pay for duplication after the first 100 pages. …” Anyone who doesn’t fit into either of these categories must “pay for search time after the first two hours and duplication after the first 100 pages.”
  2. The definition of several of the subcategories is no longer relevant in an age of online usage, citizen journalism, and bloggers. In the 21st century, who qualifies as a member of the media? Is a fee for duplication relevant if material is sent electronically or reformatted (e.g., as a PDF) and posted online? 

PAGE: 1 2

Barbie E. Keiser is an information resources management consultant located in the metropolitan Washington, D.C., area.

Email Barbie E. Keiser

Related Articles

8/19/2014Revising FOIA for Improved Access to Government Information
10/18/2012New FOIAonline Platform Launched
12/9/2014FOIA Reform Gets Key Senate Endorsement
3/31/2015Sunshine Week 2015: Open Government Is Good Government
10/20/2015The Federal Government Turns To Silicon Valley for Tech Support
3/15/2016A New Focus on Transparency for the Congressional Research Service
3/31/2016New Tool Exposes Government Information
5/26/2016LittleSis and MuckRock Work to Uncover Police Social Media Monitoring Practices
6/14/2016Recent Innovations in Open Government
8/2/2016Office of Management and Budget Publishes Update to Information Management Policy
1/3/2017The Past Year in Congress and a Look Forward
2/14/2017Improving the Process of Administering FOIA
3/7/2017FOIA Request System at the FBI Goes Automated
9/12/2017Charlottesville Sparks Rise in Citizen Journalism
1/30/2018FOIA Advisory Committee Recommends Updates in Federal Agencies
11/27/2018The Failures of FOIA
4/7/2020Celebrating Sunshine Week During the COVID-19 Crisis
4/7/2020COVID-19 NEWS: Internet Archive Defends the Launch of Its National Emergency Library
4/7/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'COVID-19 Information Overload Leads to Simple but Unhelpful Choices'
4/14/2020COVID-19 NEWS: IGI Global's 'What Is the Role of Libraries During the COVID-19 Pandemic?'
4/14/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'Q&A: What Do People Ask a Librarian in a Pandemic? L.A. Library's InfoNow Has the Answer'
4/14/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'Public Libraries Launch, Expand Services During COVID-19 Pandemic'
4/14/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'How Effective Is Quarantine Alone or in Combination With Other Public Health Measures ... ?'
4/14/2020COVID-19 NEWS: CRP's 'The Psychological Fight of Our Lives'
4/16/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'Most Libraries Are Closed. Some Librarians Still Have to Go In.'
4/16/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'IMLS Announces New Stimulus Funding for Communities Across America'
4/16/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'EveryLibrary Creates Fund to Help Library Workers in Need Because of COVID-19 Shutdowns'
4/16/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'Library of Congress Cancels Public Events Until July 1'
4/21/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'WHO COVID-19 Database Launches New Search Interface'
4/21/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'Libraries Brace for Budget Cuts'
4/21/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'Verizon Will Buy Video Conferencing Company BlueJeans'
4/23/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'Stanford Law School Creates Free Database of COVID-19 Legal Memos'
4/23/2020COVID-19 NEWS: APA Announces More Free Resources
4/23/2020COVID-19 NEWS: 'Startling Digital Divides in Distance Learning Emerge'
4/23/2020COVID-19 NEWS: European 'Commission Launches Data Sharing Platform for Researchers'
4/30/2020COVID-19 NEWS: Library Resources From SLA and IFLA
4/30/2020COVID-19 NEWS: CCC Plans a May 5 Virtual Town Hall About Building Digital Resiliency
4/30/2020COVID-19 NEWS: ReadCube Implements COVID-19 Research Pass Program for Free Content Access
4/13/2021Open Government Under the Biden Administration
8/30/2022The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Issues Guidance on Making Taxpayer-Funded Research Free to the Public

Comments Add A Comment

              Back to top