Online KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology Unisphere/DBTA ITIResearch.com
Other ITI Websites

News & Events > NewsBreaks
Back Index Forward
Twitter RSS Feed
 



Cooperation and Collaboration: Digital Preservation 2014
by
Posted On August 12, 2014
PAGE: 1 2




The final panel of the conference, Future of Web Archiving, began with Stephen Abrams, associate director of the University of California Curation Center (UC3) at the CDL (California Digital Library), asking the question, “Why web archiving?” In one sense, it is simply an extension of the long-standing mission of cultural heritage institutions “to collect, preserve, and provide access to both the scholarly record and our common cultural patrimony.” If the web is where the content is, we have to follow the content.

Then Martin Klein, postdoctoral research associate at Los Alamos National Laboratory, introduced the audience to Memento, a service that allows anyone to identify a date for which they’d like to see an archived copy of a website. Jimmy Lin, associate professor at the University of Maryland’s iSchool, sees cultural heritage archives as underused today. He is interested in building tools to support exploration and discovery in web archives, recognizing that this is only possible through cooperation between users (e.g., archivists, journalists, historians, and digital humanists) and “the techie geeks” who can help to design tools, such as Warcbase.

Next, Michael Nelson, associate professor at ODU (Old Dominion University), explained that although we’re all pleased when something is in a web archive, we should be asking how well it was archived, and what’s missing. How good are our tools for handling JavaScript, for example? His team is looking at tools that can discern damage on a rendered site. A lively discussion ensued, featuring topics such as how curated online news is balanced with a true journalist’s eye.

Closing the conference was Dragan Espenschied, Rhizome’s digital conservator, whose talk Big Data, Little Narration illustrated the ways in which we can choose how we write history in the digital age depending on the data we use. When web searches are linked, “digital culture is too large” for a single institution to accurately represent it, he said. Rhizome is an online archive of new media art that puts the artist and the user in the driver’s seat, with some unexpected consequences. Espenschied summarized his work as introducing order where there is none.

CURATEcamp

The theme for this year’s CURATEcamp was Digital Culture, with the goal of “exploring ideas and approaches to collecting and preserving digital culture both on and off the World Wide Web.” The day was masterfully facilitated by three co-chairs: Trevor Owens, digital archivist with the NDIIPP in the Office of Strategic Initiatives at the Library of Congress; Amanda Brennan, community and content associate at Tumblr; and folklorist Trevor J. Blank, assistant professor of communication at the State University of New York–Potsdam.

Participants led discussions about the web as a cultural platform and the responsibility of digital archivists to aid scholars in the study of mass culture through the “vernacular web” and “cultural heritage organizations responsible for collecting and preserving folklife and folklore,” among other topics of interest to those in the room.

Conference Takeaways

This year’s presentations suggested that there has been increased activity not only around curating and archiving beyond documents (libraries) and physical objects (museums), but also around scientific data and web-based cultural heritage collections, often user-generated (e.g., art). The technology that once required specialists to manage it is evolving to offer novices the tools to take control. Featured prominently in almost every presentation this year was a laundry list of challenges faced, so there is still plenty of opportunity for interested parties to explore these themes at next year’s conference.

Arguably, the most important aspect of the Digital Preservation conferences is not the presentations—high level though they may be—but the networking that occurs in the hallways, around the coffee service, and in the line for the restroom. These connections are invaluable throughout the year, providing a community on which attendees can rely to help with conceptual thinking or practical how-to advice. Watch for the announcement of the free conference registration next spring; the conference “sells out” quickly. It’s worth a trip to D.C., even in the summer.


PAGE: 1 2


Barbie E. Keiser is an information resources management consultant located in the metropolitan Washington, D.C., area.

Email Barbie E. Keiser

Related Articles

7/30/2013Preserving Our Digital World (#digpres2013)
9/2/2014Five Apps for Hassle-Free Travel
11/6/2014Library of Congress Releases Digital Preservation Survey Results


Comments Add A Comment

              Back to top