KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology Unisphere/DBTA
Other ITI Websites
American Library Directory Boardwalk Empire Database Trends and Applications DestinationCRM EContentMag Faulkner Information Services Fulltext Sources Online InfoToday Europe Internet@Schools Intranets Today KMWorld Library Resource Literary Market Place OnlineVideo.net Plexus Publishing Smart Customer Service Speech Technology Streaming Media Streaming Media Europe Streaming Media Producer Unisphere Research



News & Events > NewsBreaks
Back Index Forward
Twitter RSS Feed
 



New Domain Name Rules and Perhaps Dot-Lib for Libraries由edux
by
Posted On July 11, 2011
Back in 2000, I wrote a NewsBreak that considered the first addition by the Internet Corp. for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) of new generic top level domain names (gTLDs). TLDs are divided into two basic types: generic top level domains (gTLD) and country code TLDs (ccTLD). The original set of gTLDs comprised .com, .edu, .net, .org, .gov, .mil, and later .int. ccTLDs end in the (usually) ISO 3166 standard two-letter abbreviation for countries or regions, for example .fr for France, .za for South Africa, and .us for the United States. The ccTLDs are generally managed by trustees designated by the indicated country. Many have fairly stringent rules concerning who may request a domain name to include any given ccTLD—and that includes content and nationality. The French (.fr) for example, require holders of .fr URLs to be French and to include French content. Others are what might be termed ccTLDs of convenience. Perhaps the one ccTLD with the least national content is .tv for Tuvalu. Tuvalu has licensed its ccTLD and any number of television related companies employ the ccTLD.

ICANN has since followed this first wave of new gTLDs with a set of gTLDs and sponsored TLDs (sTLD) in 2004. sTLDs can be considered a subset of gTLDs, with a caveat. These are thematic, are owned and managed by an agency, and are limited to specified range of actors. The sTLD .museum, for example, can only be acquired by museums and museum-related entities. There is a second subset of gTLDs, the geographic gTLDs, restricted thus far to .cat (Catalan language related) and .asia. In 2008, ICANN adopted recommendations to facilitate new gTLDs, to include non-roman characters. In 2011, ICANN authorized the use of sTLD .xxx for adult content. The decision in 2011 came after a decade of opposition to the “explicit” domain.

ICANN is again broadening opportunities to create new gTLDs to include sTLDs. In June 2011, ICANN announced a policy to liberalize the process for creation of new gTLDs. For information on the process, see ICANN’s “New Generic Top Level Domains Fact Sheet.”

As one might imagine, there is both enthusiasm for expanding the gTLD and a renewed concern. The enthusiasm results from recognition that an expanded, perhaps an unlimited number of gTLDs creates a broad new range of potential URLs. The renewed concern also results from recognition that an expanded, perhaps an unlimited number of gTLDs creates a broad new range of potential URLs. The potential exists for copyright, trademark, and service mark infringements. Companies seeking to protect trademarks and service marks might find it necessary to register a far greater range of new domains.

All that said, is it time for libraries and library related entities to consider an sTLD? In 2001, there was some discussion in library-land to the creation of a .lib or .bib gTLD (see e.g., Koehler 2001). Given the evolution of TLD syntax, a .library gTLD might also work. Whoor rather what organizationmight manage it? As the ICANN Factsheet makes clear, the application then ownership process is not an inexpensive one. Major library associations come to mindperhaps the American Library Association (ALA) or broader still the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). Libraries, library vendors, and other library related entities might consider acquiring URLs, domain names that end in .lib, .bib, or .library. Does it make sense?

At the June 2011 meeting of the ALA in New Orleans, I asked a number of attendees, librarians all, what they thought of the idea. Some thought it was silly. Most libraries, they pointed out, were constrained either by budget or institutional considerations from straying from more than one URL. More than one URL might be confusing. Others, on the other hand, see the idea as a branding opportunity. If sTLDs become truly useful as a means of identifying, of sorting, of classifying, of indexing then libraries should take the lead. Because there are libraries everywhere, I would prefer an international body manage the sTLD. Perhaps it is indeed time to engage the idea and its management.

References

ICANN, “New Generic Top Level Domains Fact Sheet” http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/factsheet-new-gtld-program-14apr11-en.pdf

Wallace Koehler, "New Domain Names Have Arrived," Information Today NewsBreak, Nov. 27, 2000. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=17701

Wallace Koehler, "Dot-Lib for LibrariesCan It Happen? Ask ICANN" Searcher 9, 4, April 2001: 66-7.


Wallace Koehler is director/professor in the MLIS Program at Valdosta State University.

Email Wallace Koehler

Related Articles

11/27/2000New Domain Names Have Arrived
6/21/2012ICANN Releases List of 1,400 Possible New Internet Top-Level Domains
6/2/2016ICANN Debuts .ART Domain
6/28/2016U.S. Government Accepts IANA Transition Proposal


Comments Add A Comment
Posted By Joe Alagna7/12/2011 7:07:29 PM

I appreciate seeing this kind of thinking, especially for libraries which are such an important part of the Internet.

I believe that new TLDs will have an impact but must have buy in at the highest levels in any industry. .Museum has not done very well. This is because it is being ignored. .Mobi, (caters to the mobile trade) .Name (Personal names), .Jobs (HR Professionals) are all doing well and should do even better as the idea of new TLDs becomes more mainstream.

I think it would be a shame for the ALA to miss out on this historic opportunity. Libraries aren't going to disappear. They are just going to become more important online.

I've posted a set of statistics and the number of new top level domains on my home page:

http://alagna.com/2011/tld-statistics-numbers-in-various-gtlds-as-of-february-2011_110

If you'd like to see how many domains have been registered in each of the existing TLDs.

Joe Alagna is the North American General Manager for CentralNic LTD., a domain name registry.
Posted By Jean Guillon7/11/2011 9:43:07 AM

Interesting.

Jean Guillon
Registries.tel
Posted By Craig Simon7/11/2011 1:15:44 AM

For more historical background on the creation of ICANN see my PH.D. dissertation at http://www.scribd.com/doc/58805571

              Back to top