KMWorld CRM Media Streaming Media Faulkner Speech Technology Unisphere/DBTA
Other ITI Websites
American Library Directory Boardwalk Empire Database Trends and Applications DestinationCRM EContentMag Faulkner Information Services Fulltext Sources Online InfoToday Europe Internet@Schools Intranets Today KMWorld Library Resource Literary Market Place OnlineVideo.net Plexus Publishing Smart Customer Service Speech Technology Streaming Media Streaming Media Europe Streaming Media Producer Unisphere Research



News & Events > NewsBreaks
 



Back Index Forward
Twitter RSS Feed
Weekly News Digest

August 6, 2009 — In addition to this week's NewsBreaks article and the monthly NewsLink Spotlight, Information Today, Inc. (ITI) offers Weekly News Digests that feature recent product news and company announcements. Watch for additional coverage to appear in the next print issue of Information Today. For other up-to-the-minute news, check out ITIís Twitter account: @ITINewsBreaks.

CLICK HERE to view more Weekly News Digest items.

Library Groups Advise DOJ on Google Book Settlement

The American Library Association (ALA), the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) and the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) sent a letter to William F. Cavanaugh Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) Antitrust Division yesterday, requesting the division to advise the court presiding over the Google Book Settlement to supervise the implementation of the settlement closely, particularly the pricing of institutional subscriptions and the selection of the Book Rights Registry board members.

The letter, which was sent following a meeting the library groups had with the Antitrust Division, also recommended that the division itself actively monitor the parties' compliance with the settlement's provisions. The text of the letter is available at www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/GOOGLEDOJ.pdf.

In particular, the library groups urged the division to ask the court to review pricing of institutional subscriptions whenever the division concludes that the prices do not meet the economic objectives set forth in the settlement. In order to evaluate the price of an institutional subscription, the groups believe the division should have access to all relevant price information from Google and the registry.

The library associations assert that the division should ask the court to review any refusal by the registry to license copyrights in books on the same terms that are available to Google and to also review the selection process for the registry board to ensure the interests of all rightsholders are considered

With an absence of competition for the proposed services, the settlement could compromise fundamental library values, such as equity of access to information, patron privacy, and intellectual freedom, according to the library associations who filed comments with the presiding judge on behalf of libraries and the public interest.

Source: ALA Washington Office



Send correspondence concerning the Weekly News Digest to NewsBreaks Editor Brandi Scardilli

Related Articles

7/2/2009Update on the Google Book Settlement
7/27/2009Advocacy Groups Ask for Privacy Guarantees in Google Book Search
9/24/2009Google Book Search Settlement Hearing to Be Postponed
10/5/2009New Report on Filings in the Google Books Settlement
11/23/2009Here We Go Again! The Revised Google Book Settlement
3/31/2011Google Book Settlement Rejected: Whatís Next?


Comments Add A Comment

              Back to top